Brit/pol/ reckons with crime, immigration, and Jewish security after Golders Green attack
Users on /pol/ debated the Golders Green stabbings, migration policy, antisemitism law, and Britain's ethnic composition in a sprawling thread mixing news links with inflammatory commentary.
A discussion thread on /pol/ erupted around recent British news events, particularly the stabbing attack in Golders Green and its aftermath, with commenters pulling competing narratives about crime, immigration, and antisemitism policy.
The original post aggregated news stories including the Golders Green stabbings, a WWII bomb evacuation, Banksy’s recent statue reveal, and a rape conviction of a former Spandau Ballet member. Users subsequently flooded the thread with additional links and commentary, producing a chaotic mix of genuine concern, xenophobic grievance, and conspiracy-mongering.
One respondent alleged that leaked audios implicated pro-Israel groups and Benjamin Netanyahu in securing Donald Trump’s pardon of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, a convicted drug trafficker. According to the commenter, the audios supposedly revealed plans to expand military bases and economic zones in Honduras in exchange for US political support. Another user dismissed this as “bollocks.”
On antisemitism specifically, a commenter wrote that “a bunch of eastern European converts and mixed Arabs don’t speak for all Jews at all,” arguing that orthodox Jewish opposition to Israeli policy meant that “opposing the actions of those opposed by Jewish people” cannot be antisemitic. Another user quoted Conservative commentator David G.F. Frost’s call for a “zero-tolerance approach” to pro-Palestine marches and antisemitic rhetoric, then responded sarcastically: “You goys need to surrender any remaining freedom of speech for an indeterminant amount of time.”
Commenters obsessed over comparative news coverage, with one writing: “Two jews stabbed in London - Immediately declared a terrorist incident… Wogs stabs to death three young girls… Not a terrorist incident.” Users repeatedly employed racial slurs when discussing immigrants, crime, and school drop-offs. One commenter griped about non-English speakers and their children at school pickup, using multiple ethnic slurs. Another complained about cars parked illegally near schools, attributing it to migrants’ “flagrant disregard for rules.”
Most contentious was the debate over police protection for Jewish communities. Metropolitan Police Commissioner Mark Rowley reportedly defended how officers subdued the Golders Green suspect after Green Party leader Zack Polanski criticized their use of force. One commenter sardonically calculated that protecting London’s 1.7% Jewish population would require 17,647 officers if the current allocation of 300 were proportional, implying a double standard in resource allocation.
A respondent disputed any equivalence, writing: “It’s completely possible to oppose violence to Palestinian civilians while also not hating Jews,” a rare note of measured analysis in a thread dominated by grievance and speculation.
← Back to home